Let's take a look at how student evaluations are conducted for the comprehensive selection of student records for the first round of admission. One of the things that students are most curious about regarding the evaluation of student records by admission officers is which evaluation area is most important and how much the score difference is by evaluation grade. This can be seen in the student record book comprehensive evaluation table that admission officers record during the first round of selection of successful applicants. The evaluation areas in the actual student record book comprehensive evaluation table used by universities are composed of the most common items such as personality, academic ability, major suitability, and development potential.
Although the next evaluation was conducted with four evaluation areas, similar evaluation methods are used in each university, and the results of student excellence will show a tendency depending on the university, except for special cases. Evaluating excellence is not a quantitative evaluation but a qualitative evaluation. Therefore, the evaluation is not a score but an evaluation of the student's ability recorded in the student record book. Evaluation grades are evaluated qualitatively, such as 'excellent' and 'outstanding' in the 'verb' area, which is better than 'learning' and 'doing well'.
If you can find out how much higher you can evaluate a student than their grades, you can judge the possibility of applying to the university. This can be evaluated at the level of thinking ability in the 'noun' area. This can also be evaluated by the student's ability level. If you want to give full marks to all evaluation areas, you will be divided within it. The criterion for this is to evaluate the student's research ability. Research ability can be evaluated by the ability value as 'noun' and 'verb' depending on how the student solves curiosity in the student record book recorded by the student's research subject and research method. And one thing to remember about all these indicators is that you should also pay attention to self-directedness and communication skills.
Even the lowest university will have AAA on its score sheet, and even the top medical school will be able to evaluate it as CDE, which is a low score range based on the same criteria. Of course, there will be few students who apply to the top medical school and get a score of E. Generally, the top scores will be distributed to many students, and in the case of low universities, there will be a tendency to be distributed to the middle and lower ranks. And don't forget that this evaluation is a very comprehensive evaluation, so evaluate which university you can apply to with your own student record book. Evaluate where your academic ability is located, where your major suitability is located, and where your personality and development potential are distributed, and if you meet the top level, you can apply to the top university. The evaluation of academic achievement can be evaluated as part of academic achievement, major suitability, and development potential. By the way, if you have seen another student's student record book, it will be easier to evaluate. We provide various information related to university level, such as the entire student record book by university level and detailed special features by subject according to university level, so please refer to it.
The most noticeable feature is that the weight varies depending on the evaluation area. In addition, the scores by grade of the evaluation areas are not the same, and the score differences between grades are all different. This is where the characteristics of this university's student evaluation are hidden. The evaluation area with the highest weight is 'academic ability' (35 points), followed by personality (25 points). Major suitability and development potential are each scored 20 points. As the highest score difference among the evaluation areas is 15 points, it can be seen that this university attaches the most importance to students' academic ability. It is also noteworthy that the score difference between evaluation grades is not the same. In the case of academic ability, the difference between A grade and B grade is 4 points, but the difference between B grade and C grade is only 2 points. However, the difference between C grade and D grade is as much as 9 points. It can be inferred from the score difference between grades that the university intends not to select students who show academic ability below a certain level. Also, it should not be overlooked that the score difference between B and C grades is the smallest. This shows that the university considers that there is not much difference in academic ability between B and C grade students. In other words, the university intends to confirm the difference in academic ability of students with B and C grades through other evaluation areas. The same is true for the B and C grades in the personality area, which show a 1-point difference. In cases where the self-weighting of grades is large, there is a very small probability that the results of the same student will differ by 20-30 points depending on the evaluator. At this time, the university allows the third admission officer to re-evaluate to ensure the fairness of the evaluation.
There is a simple and clear rule for regular Scholastic Ability Test-based selection processes or curriculum-based selection processes by student record books. However, the comprehensive evaluation of student records, including student record books, is a qualitative evaluation system that evaluates comprehensively based on documents such as student record books. What is the most important student evaluation criterion for admission officers in this comprehensive evaluation of student records? Is this student qualified to enter our university? Can this student concentrate on academics and do well in school life after entering our university? That's the question. Then, what kind of student does the admission officer choose as a student who meets the evaluation criteria and can do well in school life? It's a middle group student. Universities say they select excellent students with one voice. However, since students have up to six opportunities to apply from rolling admissions, they should consider that a considerable number of top-ranked students are leaking to other universities. In that sense, middle group students are more likely to continue their studies by entering universities than top group students. This is why universities put the most effort into selecting middle group students. Universities prefer to group students into three groups: 'excellent', 'middle', and 'poor' according to the recruitment unit, rather than ranking individual applicants by total score. Therefore, the score difference between students grouped together is not significant. This is possible because it is a comprehensive evaluation of student records. When grouping students, excellent students who are eligible for the first admission right are selected as 1 times, and students who can pass the first admission by doing well in the interview or who have a high probability of passing the unregistered supplement are selected as 2-3 times. And students with low chances of admission are selected as 3-4 times.
The most difficult group to screen among these groups is also the middle group. Since middle group students are the most likely to actually enter the university, it is the most important and essential task for admission officers to properly define the criteria for selecting them. The most important evaluation item when evaluating middle group students, who are the core of student selection, can only be 'comprehensive evaluation'. To select a better student within a group of students who received similar curriculum grades and document evaluation scores, it is reasonable to give weight to the comprehensive evaluation results based on personality, academic ability, major suitability, and development potential. Therefore, admission officers consider the comprehensive evaluation results as an additional point concept and apply them as 3 grades such as 'admission', 'normal', and 'failure'. Black also simplifies the selection process by giving additional points only to students who meet the talent requirements for each major. Of course, it should be remembered that the criteria for applying personality, academic ability, major suitability, and development potential are somewhat different depending on the university.
